The GEPRC seems to me like the best option if you’re willing to pay a little bit more. It’s got a tough aluminum front end and a clever split top deck that allows maintenance without removing the HD camera mount. The GEPRC Mark 5 is, at the time of this writing, the most expensive. The analog version has a 1000 mW video transmitter. The V2 version fixed the “arm breaking” problem that the V1 had, but the arms are still relatively thin and may not be as durable as the other two. The Roma V2 is the lightest of the three. I was most impressed with the Evoque’s flight characteristics, although all three were very good. That’s enough to get the job done, but the Diatone and GEPRC are stronger. If you buy the analog version of the Evoque, it’s got the weakest video transmitter, at 600 mW. It’s got 20 mm-sized FC and ESC, which are usually less durable than 30mm-sized ones on the Diatone and GEPRC, although I haven’t heard any specific complaints about the Evoque blowing up ESC’s. The Evoque has awesome LED light pipes on the side plates and bottoms of the arms. So let’s focus on the things that set them apart. They’re all available in either a DJI FPV version or an analog version. They’ve all got very capable ESC, flight controller, and motors. Frankly, you won’t go wrong with any of them. The iFlight Evoque, Diatone Roma F5 V2, and GEPRC Mark 5 are all extremely closely matched in terms of performance and durability.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |